![]() ![]() It will do almost anything to avoid taking a heart with the exception of being able to get rid of the King/Ace of Spades. The computer is also extremely predictable. If however, you shoot the moon on the first hand and get in front of the computer, it appears to take it easier on you for the subsequent rounds. However, once you understand this it becomes a battle between you and the computer in terms of being able to "shoot the moon." The computer wants to give you a bad hand especially on the first round because once it gets in front of you the cards generally become worse on subsequent rounds. It stops recording zero scores after 5 and my fifth zero score was before the end of November so it's a fair assumption. This has taken me almost exactly a year to the day (my first zero score was Nov 7th 2013 so I am guessing). I am up to almost 4,000 games on my latest run and currently have an average of 81%. I am hooked on hearts - the Windows 7 version. I am really tempted to go ahead and reset the scores and start keeping track again to try to validate this but really would love to know if anyone else has any insights on this. Time and time again I'll start out scoring "0" til all my imaginary friends are at very high scores.suddenly, I'll draw the Queen under the most preposterous of circumstances, and keep drawing her until I have gone from my "0" to surpassing their 80s and 90s scores, and more often than not, I lose by one point.over and over and over again. I am now at a 34% average in close to 200 games, since that magic score date, and the way the tricks play out is absolutely a joke. HOWEVER, WHEN I GOT A "0" SCORE ON MY BIRTHDAY, I decided that no matter how obnoxious Microsoft got I would NEVER reset the stats that showed my best score as a "0".my playing has been a living hell since that date. In the past, I just got tired of it, and would reset the statistics and start over with the process repeating itself. I have always noticed that as soon as I win quite a few games in a row, the entire game changes and it becomes essentially impossible to win. : knows why the cards are dealt this way, I'd like to hear it. : maybe it's just a lousy random generator being used. : properly shuffled real deck of cards, and rigged the deal to some extent, : decided that card distribution should be more even than would occur with a : on it that the last player will play the 2. : 4 of hearts are on the table and I'm next with the 5, you can almost count : little tiresome when you see the same thing happening so often. : win more games than my three electronic opponents combined, it does get a Although the computer players are hopeless players, and : distribution of the 13 spades, or the 2,3,4,5 of hearts each being with a Certain characteristics occur far too often, such as a 4,3,3,3 ![]() : The Hearts game does not appear to deal the cards in a remotely random : I'm not sure if this is an XP game, but this is the closest NG I could
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |